Diagnostic
Two days inside your team. We watch real PRs, read your reviews, and identify the three workflows where agents will compound and the two where they will hurt.
CONSULTING For your business · 3 of 4
Agentic coding, calibrated for the boardroom.
Your team is testing Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot. Leadership wants to know what is real. We ship with these tools daily and bring numbers you can defend, not the 1.5x to 2x marketing claims.
What you get
Playbook
Tool selection, prompt patterns, review checklists, security boundaries (what code agents can touch, what they cannot), measurement plan tied to your existing dev metrics.
Pair-programming
Weekly working sessions with two to four of your engineers. We pair on real tickets so the practice lands in muscle memory, not in a wiki.
Board-ready output
One short report per month with calibrated numbers (time-to-first-PR, review cycle time, defect rate) you can put in front of your CTO or your CEO without flinching.
Engagement model
2-week assessment
Lay of the land
Diagnostic and playbook. No long-term commitment. Roughly half the cost of one bad hire.
6-week engagement
Embed and measure
Diagnostic, playbook, weekly pairing, monthly report. Suitable for a team of 5 to 25 engineers.
Who it's for
- ● VPs of Engineering and CTOs being asked "what is our AI coding strategy" and wanting an answer that holds up.
- ● Staff engineers tasked with rolling out Cursor or Copilot to a 20-person team and stuck on what success looks like.
- ● Founders building product teams from scratch who want agentic coding baked into the culture, not bolted on.
FAQ
- What productivity numbers do you actually see?
- On greenfield code with strong type signals and good prompts, 30 to 45 percent reduction in time-to-first-PR. On legacy code with weak tests, much smaller, sometimes net-negative the first month while the team learns where to push the agent and where not to.
- Will you replace our staff engineers?
- No. The biggest wins come when senior engineers get amplified, not when junior engineers get unsupervised.
- Which tool should we standardize on?
- It depends on what your team already runs and what your code review looks like. We can run a one-week tool bake-off (Cursor vs. Claude Code vs. Copilot) before recommending.